Re: New module proposal: tracker
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Maciej Piechotka <uzytkownik2 gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, Tracker mailing list <tracker-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: New module proposal: tracker
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:24:05 +0200
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:16 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
> > developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
> > inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
> >
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2009-August/msg00007.html
> >
> > The response was positive. So I would like to propose Tracker as a new
> > GNOME module.
> >
> > Right now Tracker 0.7 is currently in development and we are hoping to
> > get the 0.7. unstable release out the door in the coming month or so.
> >
> > Right now we are considering making the miners (the file system crawling
> > at this point) optional so it acts purely as a store if needed by ISVs.
> > This is not yet done in master but can be if that's a GNOME requirement.
> >
> > Dependencies include:
> >
> > libxml >= 0.6
> > libpng >= 1.2
> > libuuid
> > zlib
> > dbus >= 0.60
> > sqlite3 >= 3.5 (built with --enable-load-extension)
> > hal >= 0.5
> > vala >= 0.7.3
> > pango >= 1.0.0
> >
> > Beyond that, the rest of the requirements affect your extraction
> > ability. For example, if poppler-glib is on the platform, you can then
> > extract PDF files. This also depends on if streamanalyser is used or not
> > (which does all extraction for us and negates the needs for specific
> > libraries in Tracker).
> >
> > Dependencies about to be dropped but still needed:
> >
> > gmime
> > lex
> > yacc
> > libraptor
> >
> > The git repository is here:
> >
> > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/
> >
> > We import the following libraries:
> >
> > libinotify
> > rasqal
> >
> > Licensing wise, those libinotify and rasqal both share the LGPL, as does
> > libtracker. The rest is GPLv2 or later.
> >
> > /discuss ;)
> >
>
> Well. Currently there are two projects which, at least for the first
> sight, are similar - Tracker and Beagle. So the first question is why
> should Gnome include Tracker and not Beagle?
>
I might be wrong and things might have changed, but isn't beagle
unmaintained?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]