On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:12 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 19:05 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:22 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > Later:
> > >   Write notes, edit overview pages for things you maintain,
> > >   tell Pulse where you are so we can map our contributors,
> > >   participate in various collaborative features.  Et cetera.
> > 
> > Is stuff like merge request tracking also part of this (in an undefined
> > future), or will that be part of a gitorious alike thing?
> Maybe.  I generally take the practical approach of
> letting other tools do what they do.
> Is it worth setting up yet another service just for
> merge requests?  Maybe.
> Is it worth adding a feature to Pulse that people
> could get elsewise?  Maybe.
> So, maybe.  Depends on what people want and what
> people are willing to hack on.

Unless we add something like gitorious, I'd imagine that "merge
requests" would continue to be handled in bugzilla. A request to merge a
branch is very similar to attaching a patch.

- Owen

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]