Re: http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/pulse/web/
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/pulse/web/
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:52:11 -0400
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:12 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 19:05 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:22 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > Later:
> > > Write notes, edit overview pages for things you maintain,
> > > tell Pulse where you are so we can map our contributors,
> > > participate in various collaborative features. Et cetera.
> >
> > Is stuff like merge request tracking also part of this (in an undefined
> > future), or will that be part of a gitorious alike thing?
>
> Maybe. I generally take the practical approach of
> letting other tools do what they do.
>
> Is it worth setting up yet another service just for
> merge requests? Maybe.
>
> Is it worth adding a feature to Pulse that people
> could get elsewise? Maybe.
>
> So, maybe. Depends on what people want and what
> people are willing to hack on.
Unless we add something like gitorious, I'd imagine that "merge
requests" would continue to be handled in bugzilla. A request to merge a
branch is very similar to attaching a patch.
- Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]