Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

[Ghee Teo <Ghee Teo Sun COM>]

Davyd Madeley wrote:
> I think GTK+ is now doing the right thing.
>   
> >From my understanding, this only affects UIs created with Glade (which
> has been setting a page_size of 10 -- and it seems still isn't fixed).
>
> Matt here developed a workaround for this in libglade. That sets the
> page_size to 0 and reports a warning that your app is broken.
>   
 This is GREAT! Does this imply the bug is in libglade since it does 
not conform
to the GTK+ spec? Should the fix be made in libglade also so that new 
glade file
will conform to the GTK+ glade.
> FWIW, I have mentioned this change in the developer section of the 2.24
> release notes.
>   
 Have you a pointer to the latest 2.24 release note?

Thanks,

-Ghee
> --davyd
>
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:12 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote:
>   
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > While you have just announced 2.24.0 tarballs to be available for 22nd Sep.
> > Does this mean we are going to ship 2.24.0 without an possible 
> > resolution to this regression?
> > Since applications would not have a change to workaround this should 
> > gtk+ is not going to
> > back up this feature. If gtk+ going to back out this feature, it can 
> > only be done after 23rd Sept!
> >
> > Have the release team considered moving the 2.24.0 release date by a 
> > couple of days to
> > accommodate this?
> >
> > -Ghee
> >
> > Vincent Untz wrote:
> >     
> > > Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 09:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> > >   
> > >       
> > > > I don't see any way around discussing this with the GTK+ team before
> > > > taking any decisions.
> > > >     
> > > >         
> > > I was hoping this would be discussed on gtk-devel-list and that a
> > > decision would have been taken there :/
> > >
> > >   
> > >       
> > > > If you think this is a blocker for 2.24, then having it reverted on
> > > > September 23 should still be good for a Gnome release on September 24.
> > > >     
> > > >         
> > > Hrm, well, that's definitely late for smoketesting...
> > >
> > > Vincent
> > >
> > >   
> > >       
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> >