Re: DVCS



Hi,

I can't really see us coming to a consensus on this topic. Even after a vote we would have people continuing to use Bazaar if Git win and vice verse. GNOME is by nature a distributed project with a lot of sub modules, maintainers and thus preferences.

I personally think our time and energy would be better spent on finding ways to manage GNOME development with this diversity of version control system (and public repositories).

Translations is often brought up as a tricky part for this, can we handle them in a way where they are agnostic to the VCS system the modules happen to be in. I know back in the days when we had Planner on Codefactory servers it was a pain as the translation "system" we used required the translators to commit directly into the CVS/SVN modules.

Can we come up with a better way of handling this?

We already have our stack spread out over a number of different repository services and VCS systems, I think it's time we come to term with the fact that this is the way GNOME is built (and imho should be built).

Cheers,
  Micke

28 okt 2008 kl. 17.00 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:

Claudio Saavedra wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +0000, John Carr wrote:
Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war cause we
already had plenty of that and nothing good comes out of that.
I think the vote should be down to the foundation members.

I actually think that, if any, the vote should be down to the GNOME SVN
users. But all of them (or at least those who care enough to vote).

Agreed. Only recently active SVN users. Why should past contributors who do
not commit anymore decide what DVCS tool *I* use?

Claudio

behdad
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

--
Mikael Hallendal
Imendio AB - Expert solutions in GTK+
http://www.imendio.com







[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]