Re: FUD from PackageKit, Was: External dependencies, DeviceKit-power and GNOME Power Manager
- From: "Richard Hughes" <hughsient gmail com>
- To: "Josselin Mouette" <joss debian org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: FUD from PackageKit, Was: External dependencies, DeviceKit-power and GNOME Power Manager
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:44:14 +0000
On 11/25/08, Josselin Mouette <joss debian org> wrote:
> I still don't understand why you are restricting it to a single category
> of questions. Debconf allows that and much more, in a (of course)
> structured way.
Right, so you guys need to propose extensions (and code!) on the
PackageKit mailing list like SUSE guys did with the EULA callbacks.
> Synaptic won't open a terminal either, except on request, for
> informational purposes.
But it's running a hidden VTE widget. As root.
> Furthermore it sounds strange to advocate at the same time that people
> don't run a GTK+ app as root, and to ask to use something else than
> PackageKit to do complex operations. Is secure design only good for
> small operations? Or maybe you think distribution upgrades can only be
> done with a CLI?
We need to discuss this on the PK mailing list.
> I don't recall having asked anyone to implement anything for us. However
> I do recall being explained that, if implemented, debconf support would
> not make it into your code.
"Advanced users can reconfigure packages in a debian specific helper
program (I'll even ship this in PackageKit in the contrib directory if
> These kinds of little sentences are precisely the hostility I was
> talking about. You grew hate for the very idea of correctly supporting
> Debian based on false ideas of what our requirements are, and ignored
> any further attempts of explanations.
No, this is not the case at all. This is my last email on this thread.
] [Thread Prev