On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 02:35 +0200, natan yellin wrote: > Where is the code currently hosted? Subdirs of http://svn.galago-project.org/trunk/ Nicolas > > I'd like to play around with this if I have time. > > -Natan > 2008/11/6 Christian Hammond <chipx86 chipx86 com> > I can assure you that this hasn't bit-rotted. It has been in > development, but my work on Unity at VMware this past year > basically took up all my free time. > > I would be happy to have people who want to contribute and fix > bugs. I plan to keep the roll as maintainer, and have a couple > people in mind for a co-maintainer. If people really want > certain things in or fixed, by all means, submit patches. > Nobody has done so in a while and nobody's really been > complaining about anything to my knowledge, so I haven't felt > that a release was that urgent. Still, there are some > important fixes in SVN, some of which were waiting for > additional patches that I never got and only recently had time > to finish up. I should be in a good position to do a release > soon. > > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chipx86 chipx86 com > VMware, Inc. > > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Patryk Zawadzki > <patrys pld-linux org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:30 PM, A. Walton > <awalton gnome org> wrote: > > There are other maintenance-related issues to bring > up as well, like > > the duplicated functionality in having both > > notification-daemon+libnotify and libcanberra doing > sound > > notifications (tiny amount of code we could drop > from the n-d > > implementation, since it seems libcanberra is/will > be better taken > > care of, at least for now). Either way, it would be > nice to at least > > see the notification stuff imported into GNOME's > tree, where more > > people are likely to put eyes on it and be able to > do things such as > > roll releases, squash a couple of tiny leaks Ubuntu > is shipping > > patches for, etc. It would be a big step forward > just to get that far. > > > Hell, I know almost nothing about its internals but > still would be > willing to become a maintainer if needed (maybe I > wouldn't do much in > terms of real programming time but I sure can review > and commit > patches). It's just too useful to let it bit-rot. Over > time we can > adjust the feature set and/or the API (should not be a > huge problem as > long as we update libnotify as well). > > -- > Patryk Zawadzki > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > !DSPAM:1,491f6b0279881849514745! > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > !DSPAM:1,491f6b0279881849514745!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part