Re: Module proposal: Empathy for GNOME 2.24

[Sven Herzberg <herzi gnome-de org>]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 27.03.2008, 07:17 -0700 schrieb Ethan Osten:
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 11:39 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> > Saying "Missing password security" is just being factual, albeit
> > syntetic.  "And absolute no-go in the current shape" is just pointing
> > out that lack of security is a feature that, in his opinion, should
> > block inclusion in the desktop.  [ I agree with this view, BTW, but that
> > is beside the point ].
> "And absolute no-go in the current shape" does *not* necessarily mean
> "that password security issue is the most important thing. The "and"
> implies independence from the previous sentence, else it would be "This
> makes it..." and so on. With the conjunction in place, it logically
> reads as an independent reason against Empathy.

Thanks for being so pedantic. The "And" actually is a typo supposed to
be "An". You're doing a good job in keeping this running on a personal,
non fact-based level.

Regards,
  Sven