On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 21:26 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:11 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 09:26 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > > libmissioncontrol is LGPLv2 only. This is a problem as it prevent Gnome > > > to ever move to (L)GPLv3. > > > > So what? > > > > LGPLv2 is Free Software. That is sufficient in our view. Even more so > > because we are talking about the LGPL here. > > It is not a problem of freedom but a problem of license compatibility. > LGPLv2-only is NOT compatible with v3. > > Let's not make mistakes and anticipate. The move to (L)GPLv3 is > unavoidable, even though it is not instant. > > Hub > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list Xavier C said there is been work done to add a dbus interface which may work around this. If it's not this instant what is the problem? -- Patrick Ohearn Email: pat ge3k net Jabber: pat ge3k net Site: http://ge3k.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part