Re: Composition [was Re: gnome-session proposal]
- From: "Iain *" <iaingnome gmail com>
- To: "Karl Lattimer" <karl qdh org uk>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Composition [was Re: gnome-session proposal]
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:45:30 +0100
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Karl Lattimer <karl qdh org uk> wrote:
> Have you looked at xcompmgr? it might be a good starting point. I have
> somewhere a hacked up version of xcompmgr which has some extra features.
> Let me know if you'd like it.
Good idea, wish I'd thought of that first...
/*
* Copyright (C) 2007 Iain Holmes
* Based on xcompmgr - (c) 2003 Keith Packard
* xfwm4 - (c) 2005-2007 Olivier Fourdan
*/
>
> And although you think translucency is the only useful feature, I think
> window shadows are an essential addition also, as they provide some
> depth to the window layering.
No, translucency is the only essential feature for a compositor.
Things break if there is no translucency.
Nothing breaks if there's no drop shadows.
iain
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]