Re: build system alternatives (Was: Using vala in GNOME)
- From: Colin Walters <walters redhat com>
- To: Johan Dahlin <jdahlin async com br>
- Cc: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, David Malcolm <dmalcolm redhat com>
- Subject: Re: build system alternatives (Was: Using vala in GNOME)
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:09:45 -0400
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 16:02 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> The contribution barrier for GNOME is way to high as it is today, I'm merely
> trying to reduce it by allowing developers from other (as in non-unix)
> backgrounds be able to contribute.
Strategically speaking, while I think it makes sense for GNOME to invest
in the fundamentals (core GTK+ windowing, DBus) of running on
non-freedesktop.org platforms[1], developer time is better spent pushing
the free platform as a whole forward. Competing with
Qt/Swing/Windows.Forms/XULRunner/AIR (Qt in particular) for this is a
big project.
So in this particular case, our target audience for GTK+ on Windows/OS X
is experienced developers familiar with the free desktop stack who at
least somewhat understand autotools, etc.
[1] I tend not to say "Linux" for this anymore; freedesktop.org is a lot
more accurate
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]