Re: Need input from the community for anjuta (was Re: Proposed module: anjuta)

[Halton Huo <Halton Huo Sun COM>]

As I ever ported anjuta to Solaris platform, I'd like to say something
here:

1. Anjuta is really helpful and attractive to new developers for Gtk
+/GNOME.
2. It does have glade and devhelp built-in.
3. For users who are used to use IDE, anjuta is first choice under GNOME
environment. Although we have SunStudio, eclipse, etc.   

Thanks,
Halton.
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 00:57 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 06/01/2008 alle 23.47 +0100, Vincent Untz ha scritto:
> 
> > If you use anjuta, speak up. If you have tried anjuta, speak up. If the
> > name anjuta makes you feel something, speak up. If you want to be the
> > next big movie star, speak up. Now.
> 
> Hi, as a new contributor to the GNOME project, I must say that I'm all
> for the inclusion of Anjuta into the platform, as that, together with
> Devhelp, are the tools that made easier for me to start writing patches
> and code.
> I used Anjuta for quite a long time now and I've seen many progress in
> its development. I'm not following SVN, but I'm using the "unstable"
> releases and I've rarely seen a crash or strange behaviour. Devhelp and
> Glade integration are already there and work great, and I recently read
> [1] that new features are coming in too.
> What I miss is a better autocompletion support when using GtkSourceView,
> which has some minor flaws, and support for git and "modern" VCS other
> than CVS and SVN.
> So, all in all it's a big +1 for me.
> 
> [1] -
> http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/2008/01/05/gtksourceview-21-in-anjuta/
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list