Re: State of gvfs in Gnome 2.21

[Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:28:21AM -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> > > I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the
> > > gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously,
> > > releasing Nautilus with too many or some big regressions is not a good
> > > plan.
> >
> > More for release-team to decide, not d-d-l. Devs should code.
> 
> Bzzt. Also wrong answer. r-t's role is in large part to reflect the

I don't like that tone. I think it is the right thing and I'm not
answering a question.

> will of devs, so devs should definitely be discussing how to
> prioritize and deal with this problem.

Huge threads on d-d-l are generally useless. Direct communication with
relevant dev is far more efficient.

Last message from me in this thread.

-- 
Regards,
Olav