Re: State of gvfs in Gnome 2.21

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:22 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:

> At this point, it's not just about nautilus. Other modules were ported
> to gio... Reverting, while doable, would be painful.
> 
> I'm not sold on the fact that there are many important regressions. The
> main regressions, in my mind, are the ftp backend, the network backend
> and the connect dialog. There might be some other regressions, but I've
> not noticed them. (well, there are also the themes and fonts backends,
> but they're clearly not blocker)

Yeah, i also don't see the regressions as major. I mean, its not like
gnome-vfs is bugfree. The reason we're going from it is because its
problematic.

> Network backend and Connect dialog shouldn't be hard. I'm volunteering
> to do the Connect dialog. And maybe the network backend if nobody steps
> up.

The code for the old dialog is still there, but not built. Would be cool
if you could ressurect it.