Re: Sound effects
- From: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre lureau gmail com>
- To: Iain <iain gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Sound effects
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:34:46 +0200
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Iain <iain gnome org> wrote:
> Some thoughts on sounds.
> People don't use sound effects on the desktop.
That is a nice way to start. Why don't you mute sound effects then?
and why do you even asked for "one" sound later. Why do you even
bother write a long mail about sounds?
> One of the first things many people do is turn them off.
> The only device I know where people don't turn them off is the iPod.
> We have a sound naming spec, yet no-one seems to care to design
> sound schemes for them 
Because it's hard. Making a collection of sounds that are pleasant and
kind of neutral (freedesktop) is hard. I don't know what sound
synthesizer or application, or sound set can help you to achieve this
> I think the reason for this is twofold:
> a) The sound naming spec specifies too many arbitrary sounds
> b) The sound naming spec defines so many sounds that it is nearly
> impossible to a sound designer to create meaningful sounds that
> differentiate between the actions
> The sound naming spec defines 125 sounds.
> That is 125 sounds for the user to learn the meaning of.
> Because the sounds defined are incredibly arbitrary the sounds run the
> risk of having their meaning overloaded.
> For example,
> We have complete-media-rip, complete-copy, complete-scan, but no
> complete-print, no complete-fax. What sounds should be used for those?
> Each time the sound is overloaded, it is a new meaning for the user to learn.
> With sounds like window-new, window-move-start, window-move-end,
> window-minimized, window-unminimized will the computer ever be silent?
> No wonder people turn the sounds off if they're going to make it sound
> like there's a hyperactive child in the room screaming for attention
] [Thread Prev