Re: Reduced Bugzilla functionality for 6+ months -- acceptable?

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 01:14:53PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Not much discussion. Moving on to making priority list (Max made a
> proposal, proposed some changes). Next steps is to get the funding, then
> publish timeframe. Initial upgrade won't be just Bz 3.2, so it'll take a
> while before bgo is upgraded. I won't to show when approx. the upgrade
                                  ^^^^^ want
> will occur (also so it can be planned with GNOME releases etc), then
> also show the timeframe for missing features.
> Regarding upgrade: bgo will be upgraded to the Bz 3.2 when considered
> good enough. After that whenever a new feature is available (estimated
> to be between a few days between features to a few weeks, depending on
> complexity).


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]