Re: AT-SPI hard code freeze break request
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- Cc: Willie Walker <William Walker sun com>, release-team gnome org, Eitan Isaacson <eitan ascender com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: AT-SPI hard code freeze break request
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:30:27 +0200
Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 10:20 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
> On 9/15/07, Willie Walker <William Walker sun com> wrote:
> > Hi All:
> > GNOME 2.20.0 is pyatspi's first official release to the world, so we
> > want to get the API as close to AT-SPI as possible. In addition, we
> > want it to support the impending FF3 event type annotation feature. The
> > patches in question accomplish these goals and have been tested by
> > various members of the AT-SPI, Accerciser, and Orca teams.
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467366 is most important
> > because it will allow the new Firefox 3 annotated event types to come
> > through to users of pyatspi (e.g., Dogtail, LDTP, Accerciser, and soon
> > Orca). Without this patch, the annotated Firefox 3 event types do not
> > make it through, breaking any pyatspi client that happens to be
> > listening for the events, whether they are annotated or not.
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472301 is important as well
> > because it will allow users of pyatspi to get the expected experience of
> > AT-SPI where the return value of the event handler specifies whether or
> > not to consume a device event. Without this patch, the return value is
> > ignored, breaking with the expected experience of AT-SPI.
> I really hate hard code freeze break requests of this magnitude, but
> given your testing and careful explanation...and the fact that new
> changes in FF are somewhat forcing your hand, here's approval 1 of 2.
Thanks for the extended explanation, Willie.
Let's get this in. Approval 2 of 2.
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
] [Thread Prev