Re: Pulseaudio

On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:26 +0200, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm new to this list, so sorry if I ask something already discussed.
> It has been a while since esound has received some attention - releases
> are almost stalled. Looking at the GNOME wiki, it seems that Pulseaudio
> is the stronger candidate between alternatives, and that it allows for
> quite a lot of nifty things.
> I'm running pulseaudio since four or five months now on two of my
> desktop systems, both x86 and PPC, and I must say that I'm really
> satisfied by it. 
> It's quite stable and has very few compelling bugs for the normal user
> (e.g. when using it as an esound replacement on a machine with more than
> a logged in user it doesn't share the esd socket, or similar).
> It also seems to be actively developed, and is shipped by default with
> Fedora 8.
> Can it be eligible for inclusion in GNOME 2.22?
it looks pretty neat from what was shown at the Boston summit, so yes,
I'd vote for its inclusion, although some more integration work needs to
be done, but I think it's perfectly doable for 2.22.
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]