Re: Update required system-tools-backends to 2.1/2.2
- From: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org>
- To: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- Cc: "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Update required system-tools-backends to 2.1/2.2
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:28:30 +0100
Hi Vincent!
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:21 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 04 janvier 2007, à 20:11, Carlos Garnacho a écrit :
> > Hi!,
> >
> > As seen on http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies
> > system-tools-backends minimum dependency version is 1.9.7, it would be
> > great to upgrade that dependency to 2.1.2, it features the extensible
> > list of supported interface configuration methods and wireless key types
> > (for example, Feisty has support for local Zeroconf networks, and the
> > g-s-t frontends should notice this without affecting other
> > distributions)
> >
> > Another desirable effect is that the 2.1.x versions use a lightweight
> > dispatcher, reducing hugely memory consumption during inactivity
> > compared to the 1.9/2.0 versions (marvels of interpreted languages...)
> >
> > Obviously, the plan is to release s-t-b 2.2.0 with/before gnome 2.18.
> > Opinions?
>
> Sorry, should have replied sooner.
>
> Are both versions compatible? Or do you need some feature that's in
> 2.1.x?
2.1.x is compatible with 1.9.x/2.0.x, but it adds the feature I
explained in my original mail, which required liboobs and g-s-t code to
take advantage of it.
>
> I guess it's okay to require the newer system-tools-backends, but if the
> minimum required version is still 1.9.7, then we can change only the
> recommended version...
I've just rolled liboobs and g-s-t without the feature before the
freezes are in effect, anyway it could be great to add 2.1.x as the
recommended version, but I guess that by now the features will have to
wait for 2.20...
Regards
>
> Thanks
>
> Vincent
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]