Re: Generating excitement in GNOME
- From: Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
- To: "John (J5) Palmieri" <johnp redhat com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Generating excitement in GNOME
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:20:02 +0100
My personal reaction is that it would be more useful to have a GNOME
"distribution" (such as something jhbuild or garnome derived) which can
act as a testbed of next-generation technologies - and where people can
happily make different modules work together, or swap out the panel for
something else, for example - than to take a selection of modules and
put them in another formal release set.
Another release set opens a real can of worms - what's the criteria for
inclusion? Are we creating an artificial barrier that a cool project has
to get over before it is taken seriously? Would any degree of conformity
to a 6-month cycle would be expected - this could just be a pain for
modules that want to focus on breaking everything together while they
still can.
My 2p.
--
Andrew
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]