Re: GUnique [Was: gnome-utils branched for GNOME 2.16]
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "Alexander Larsson" <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GUnique [Was: gnome-utils branched for GNOME 2.16]
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:12:01 -0600
On 9/22/06, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
Uhm? Why not use X for IPC?
*shrug* I remember that we (Matthias, Vytas, and I) discussed D-Bus,
Bonobo, and Bacon (since there were several Gnome applications using
each of those for their single-instance mechanism) and X (which
Matthias brought up and also since Mozilla/Firefox uses it for its
single-instance mechanism). However, I no longer recall any details
about this particular choice since I was more interested in the WM
interaction details (surprise, surprise). It may have been that Vytas
was familiar with D-Bus and Bacon and we figured it was more important
to get other details worked out first, but I just don't remember.
However, Vytas did design GUnique to make the backend easy to
transparently replace.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]