Re: Glade 3.0 stable branched

[Tristan Van Berkom <tvb gnome org>]

Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
> > Vincent Untz wrote:
> >
> > > Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
> > >
> > >
> > > > to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas 
> > > > on that ?
> > >
> > > Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
> > > can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
> >
> > I guess a reply on my behalf is called for here ;-)
> >
> > A few points I guess I'll raise in the favor of Glade;
> >
> >    o Support for all widgets in gtk+ including depricated ones
>
>
> Depends on what supported means;
> GtkTreeView, GtkIconView & friends are not really supported by glade.
>
> Nor by Gazpacho, Stetic or anything else...

Yes,
   I should say "anything supported by libglade" - non-widget objects
have been supported by the glade tool itself since about one year, integrating
non-widget objects in the GTK widget catalog has been put off untill we have
an appropriate loader (i.e. the Gtk+ builder for 2.12 or patches to libglade).

Cheers,
                     -Tristan