Re: Glade 3.0 stable branched

[Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>]

Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Vincent Untz wrote:
>> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>>
>>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas 
>>> on that ?
>> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
>> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
>>
> 
> I guess a reply on my behalf is called for here ;-)
> 
> A few points I guess I'll raise in the favor of Glade;
> 
>     o Support for all widgets in gtk+ including depricated ones

Depends on what supported means;
GtkTreeView, GtkIconView & friends are not really supported by glade.

Nor by Gazpacho, Stetic or anything else...

Johan