Re: proposed architecture evolutions for GConf



On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 22:24 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 12:02 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> 
> > There are several ways to deal with a single-session, single-host
> > configuration engine. Real problems arise when the user can log in
> > several times on different machines, with a shared filesystem. With the
> > number of corporate users working over NFS, this is not something we can
> > ignore.
> 
> It is possible to write alternative GConf backends. I recall that Sun
> have written one that uses LDAP, its name starts with an A, but I can't
> recall what it is.

Failing that there is always this LDAP backend, though it probably needs
some love to bring it forward to recent GConf API :/

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gconf-list/2000-November/msg00020.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]