Re: Baobab



On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:47 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Emmanuele Bassi">
> 
> > The GNOME Utilities package is a small package that GNOME has kept since
> > the 1.x era (and before); it provides some application other than baobab,
> > like the screenshoter, the file search dialog, the dictionary and the
> > system log viewer, that are not sufficiently big to warrant their own
> > package but at the same time are considered part of the basic offering of
> > GNOME itself.
> 
> I think Davyd's question was more about whether Baobab (or its function) is
> suitable to be considered part of the basic offering of GNOME itself. I am
> not convinced it should be there myself.

I personally love when a discussion about the release takes place; I
love it a little less when it happens three months after I started the
discussion, after I received a "go ahead" from the release team, and
especially when the integration has already been done and releases are
already out.

This is really timely.  Not.

Ciao,
 Emmanuele.

-- 
Emmanuele Bassi,  E: ebassi gmail com
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net
B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]