Re: Baobab
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Baobab
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:14:11 +0100
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:47 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Emmanuele Bassi">
>
> > The GNOME Utilities package is a small package that GNOME has kept since
> > the 1.x era (and before); it provides some application other than baobab,
> > like the screenshoter, the file search dialog, the dictionary and the
> > system log viewer, that are not sufficiently big to warrant their own
> > package but at the same time are considered part of the basic offering of
> > GNOME itself.
>
> I think Davyd's question was more about whether Baobab (or its function) is
> suitable to be considered part of the basic offering of GNOME itself. I am
> not convinced it should be there myself.
I personally love when a discussion about the release takes place; I
love it a little less when it happens three months after I started the
discussion, after I received a "go ahead" from the release team, and
especially when the integration has already been done and releases are
already out.
This is really timely. Not.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
Emmanuele Bassi, E: ebassi gmail com
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net
B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]