Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Steve Frécinaux <nudrema gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Trying to reach consensus for the proposed modules
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:02:38 +0100
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 00:01 +0100, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
> Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > The previous consensus and agreement was that desktop modules could
> > depend upon python bindings found in the bindings release set.
> > gnome-python-extras isn't part of that set.
>
> gedit's main widget is gtksourceview, which is not part of the pygtk
> bindings, so it would have been difficult not to depend on
> pygtksourceview
I don't understand how the python gtksourceview bindings are being used
by gedit. Is it used by the plugin system or by a plugin that is
supplied with gedit?
> > A variety of options exist:
> > [...]
>
> The possibility of creating a pygtksourceview package has been aborded.
> So, a possible (d) would be to create a “gnome-python-base” which would
> be a subset of the current gnome-python-extra, with only bindings of
> blessed gnome libraries, leaving python-gnome-extra as its current
> status of “experimental” package.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]