Re: GDFL - why is it bad? Debian could do better! (was: Re: Debian and the GFDL problem)
- From: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- To: Andy Tai <atai atai org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GDFL - why is it bad? Debian could do better! (was: Re: Debian and the GFDL problem)
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:13:30 -0700
On 1/8/06, Andy Tai <atai atai org> wrote:
> Same for your attacks on the GFDL... "they have nothing
> to do on a GNOME mailing list. Please bring this on another place or in
> private mail."
I respectfully disagree. There are those that feel that the GFDL is a
very poor choice and with what, at least to me, looks like solid
reasoning. I do not use Debian or its derivatives, but I fully agree
with their sentiment on this issue -- meaning that I too feel that
this is a problem and one which affects everyone. The easiest
solution appears to be asking copyright holders to dual license their
work. However, I do agree that the discussion should probably be
moved to gnome-docs-list (or perhaps in contacting individual authors)
instead of continued here. But it's hard to fault Josselin for trying
to correct misunderstandings (and in fact, I feel Josselin should get
bonus points for doing quite well at responding reasonably to
deliberately inflammatory (and partially off-topic) emails).
Just my $0.02,
Elijah
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]