Re: control-center 2.13.90 released
- From: Davyd Madeley <davyd madeley id au>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: control-center 2.13.90 released
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:30:13 +0800
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:27:33PM -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 17:49 +0000, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > > From: Davyd Madeley <davyd madeley id au>
> > > At this stage in the game, I think we should look at doing three
> > > things:
> > > (1) reverting the UI change, it is a bandaid fix to a deeper
> > > problem;
> >
> > If the hope is to change it back when things get faster then this current
> > change is inflicting unnecessary software churn on users.
> >
> > As I'm on older crappy hardware I guess I should sit out this release
> > cycle entirely as an even slower Gnome would probably kill it.
> >
> > > (2) shipping GNOME 2.14 with gtk-engines 2.6, leaving people who
> > > giving us more time to optimise gtk-engines/cairo/X
> >
> > I expect this would be unpopular with developers (especialy dobey).
> > How many developers have really crappy hardware? (ie > 3 years old)
>
> Developers be damned. Let's take care of our users.
>
> Whizbang flashiness is great, but if we can't deliver
> it quickly on moderate hardware, then it needs to sit
> on the sidelines until we can. My machine is around
> two years old. It is not a crappy machine. I had to
> go back to an old gtk-engines because I just couldn't
> handle it anymore.
Shaun has nailed it here. We should also consider our third-party
developers. We're talking about people who have no interaction with
the community and have simply been complaining about the degrading
quality of GNOME releases (these people do exist).
--d
--
Davyd Madeley
http://www.davyd.id.au/
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]