Re: Liboobs versions

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On 12/5/06, Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org> wrote:
> Hi!,
>
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 03:13 -0300, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > gnome-system-tools now depends on liboobs 2.17.4 while
> > <http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/jhbuild/modulesets/freedesktop-2.18.modules?rev=1.8>, which is used by the GNOME 2.18 moduleset, still lists 0.6.0.
>
> Yes, that dependency was added yesterday to use an API addition.
>
> >
> > <http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies> would
> > need a bit of liboobs love too.
>
> I just learnt that liboobs is considered an external dependency, I
> (naively?) thought that it was a desktop module, given that it contains
> 90% of the logical weight of g-s-t and based on a brief conversation
> with the release team some time ago [1].
>
> Maybe should liboobs be considered a Desktop module?

Yes, this looks like an oversight.  Given that it contains what was
part of g-s-t previously I think that makes sense.  Thanks for
pointing this out.

Elijah