Re: Liboobs versions

[Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no>]

s�0.12.2006 kl. 18.36 -0700, skrev Elijah Newren:
> On 12/5/06, Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org> wrote:
> > Hi!,
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 03:13 -0300, Mariano Su�z-Alvarez wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > gnome-system-tools now depends on liboobs 2.17.4 while
> > > <http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/jhbuild/modulesets/freedesktop-2.18.modules?rev=1.8>, which is used by the GNOME 2.18 moduleset, still lists 0.6.0.
> >
> > Yes, that dependency was added yesterday to use an API addition.
> >
> > >
> > > <http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies> would
> > > need a bit of liboobs love too.
> >
> > I just learnt that liboobs is considered an external dependency, I
> > (naively?) thought that it was a desktop module, given that it contains
> > 90% of the logical weight of g-s-t and based on a brief conversation
> > with the release team some time ago [1].
> >
> > Maybe should liboobs be considered a Desktop module?
> 
> Yes, this looks like an oversight.  Given that it contains what was
> part of g-s-t previously I think that makes sense.  Thanks for
> pointing this out.
> 
Does this go for libgnomekbd too then since that was part of
gnome-control-center before being split out?

Cheers
Kjartan