Re: Gnome 2 infinity and beyond [was Re: Tango and 2.16]

On 4/20/06, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> wrote:
> Right, but public correspondence about "GNOME 17 [1] (please don't get
> too excited it's a development release)" is going to be more confusing than
> the current fairly well-understood Linux-kernel style numbering.

Yes, which is why I expect most would probably object.  But, at the
end of the day, it's just a version number.  So, I'm fine with "Gnome
2" to infinity and beyond...

> [1] I'm going to beat up on you until you start writing 'GNOME' correctly!

I have been writing 'Gnome' correctly all along.  It's you who writes
it wrong.  ;-)

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]