Re: Proposal for inclusion in desktop: gnome-screensaver
- From: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>
- To: William Jon McCann <mccann jhu edu>
- Cc: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal for inclusion in desktop: gnome-screensaver
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:23:57 +0200
Il giorno mer, 26/10/2005 alle 13.03 -0400, William Jon McCann ha
scritto:
> Hi Shaun,
> > * The timeout when you type an incorrect password is very long.
>
> Yes it is. I found that some novice and show users weren't able to
> notice, read, and understand the error message text before the dialog
> disappeared. It used to be quite a short timeout but I extended it
> recently. Perhaps, I've extended it too much.
a11y? Section 508 of Rehabilitation Act should says something about
timed out stuff (something like a minimum timeout for impaired user
and/or that users should be able to configure timeouts).
Here (in Italy) here is a law modeled on Section 508 and WCAG 1.0 [1]. A
requisite for this law is something like: if a service is available only
within a T time, you have to declare it to the user and advise about the
maximum time.
So:
* Should gnome-screensaver wait for a "long" time, so impaired
users can read the wrong password message?
* Should gnome-screensaver show the 'timeout' bar when typing the
password (as well as xscreensaver)?
[1] References are
WCAG 1.0: 7.4, 7,5
Sec 508: 1194.22 (p)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]