Re: Default Theme Progress
- From: Chipzz <chipzz ULYSSIS Org>
- To: seth gnome org
- Cc: Eugenia Loli-Queru <eloli hotmail com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Default Theme Progress
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:43:56 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Seth Nickell wrote:
> This is not germane to the discussion, since Jeff does not need a "me
> too". Please see:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-February/msg00348.html
> . I know you have strong feelings you want to express, but please find
Sorry, maybe you misread me, but that is what I thought when I read that
article. I did not intend to vend that impression here, I was just
saying, that was my reaction, and as such why it was wrong from Eugenia
to formulate it that way.
I apologize if I offended you.
> another venue. In this case, I would suggest posting a comment to the
> OSNews article you object to. If you need to reply, please do so
You're probably right, but I do not feel like wasting more energy than I
allready have. ;)
> off-list so we don't flood more hackers with mail.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Seth
kr,
Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
Chipzz ULYSSIS Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Baldric, you wouldn't recognize a subtle plan if it painted itself pur-
ple and danced naked on a harpsicord singing 'subtle plans are here a-
gain'."
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]