Re: Proposed Modules, My Take
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Chipzz ULYSSIS Org
- Cc: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposed Modules, My Take
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:23:44 +0100
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 01:34 +0100, Chipzz wrote:
> > New versions must not break ABI. While PyGTK itself does not break, it
> > does heavily depend on the ABI of Python and that *does* break. It's
> > like saying it's alright if GTK+ is stable but glib can be unstable.
>
> You're talking bs and your example is 100% wrong.
> It IS the same as saying that gtkmm is stable, but g++ is not.
The difference is that my already-compiled application will continue to
work if I install a later version of g++. That is not always true for
interpreted languages.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]