Re: Proposed Modules, My Take
- From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposed Modules, My Take
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:42:34 -0500
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 11:57 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> * pygtk
>
> The consensus seemed to be that we clearly document that pygtk-based apps
> are appropriate for the Desktop release rather than adding pygtk itself to
> either Platform or Desktop. As yet, no pygtk-based apps have been proposed
> for inclusion anyway.
Can a version of Python be declared to go with this if its in the
Bindings? Otherwise every distro could end up with a different version
of Python resulting in various incompatibilities - especially in the
case where multiple versions of Python are installed.
Does /usr/bin/python reference the vesion with pygtk? If apps
hardcode /usr/bin/python-2.2 what happens on a distro that only has 2.3?
Both problems disappear if we mandate that, say, Python 2.3 be used and
that all apps using the "official GNOME Bindings" reference python-2.3
explicitly, or something like that.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]