Re: Revisiting the Gnome Bindings
- From: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>
- Cc: gnome-desktop-devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Revisiting the Gnome Bindings
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:46:27 +0200
Hey,
> 1) Easy to program in and has naturally clear syntax and simple
> structure. (that rules out C++)
Why prove Havoc right so quickly ? The discussion on "what language
should go in" has been hashed out numerous times already, don't give
Havoc the satisfaction of predicting our behaviour of degenerating the
discussion into a language discussion.
I am asking a very concrete, specific thing - here's a module I'm
maintainer of and which I feel would benefit from being written in
something more flexible than C, and I want to use python for it.
What would happen to the modules involved ?
Thomas
Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
God how I hate myself for
still wanting her
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]