On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:11 +0000, Mike Hearn wrote: > I still vote for having Polypaudio in the GNOME desktop. Otherwise the > same arguments will just be had by distro vendors over and over. Er, that makes little sense. It's a bit like saying "I still vote for including the FreeBSD kernel in the GNOME desktop. Otherwise, people will just argue over which kernel to use". For example, on Solaris it seems quite likely to me they might want to use NAS; I'm pretty sure that's what the Sun Ray terminals use, for example. So our including Polypaudio is just redundant with the OS, and it's very unlikely they would rebuild their OS just because GNOME included Polypaudio.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part