Re: Polypaudio for Gnome 2.10, the next steps

["Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>]

> On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 22:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> What I'd like to know: what is still missing? what are the next steps?
>> Am I even near to get this into Gnome 2.10? Are there any general
>> objections towards replacing Esound with Polypaudio? I am interested
>> in a "yes" or "no" statement as definite and official as I can get it.
>
> This is passing the buck a bit but I'd like to hear from some of the
> teams that would be using this - Helix, GStreamer, Rhythmbox, Sound
> Juicer, whoever.
>
> I know some of those groups have traditionally said "we are agnostic,
> you can choose the sound server you like" but the point is to get some
> judgments from people who know about multimedia. Do they think this
> would be a nice improvement over esound and would they set up their
> stuff to use it by default.

And I thought we wanted to share one sound server with KDE if possible. If
so then you should really try to get feedback from them too.

Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com