I don't know if Polypaudio is good in low-latency cases, but the reason why we are not using ESound in GnomeMeeting is that ESound gives very bad results with GnomeMeeting. So *any* replacement able to cope with both input and output with reasonable delay is good for me. Le lundi 22 novembre 2004 à 17:31 -0500, Havoc Pennington a écrit : > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 22:56 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > What I'd like to know: what is still missing? what are the next steps? > > Am I even near to get this into Gnome 2.10? Are there any general > > objections towards replacing Esound with Polypaudio? I am interested > > in a "yes" or "no" statement as definite and official as I can get it. > > This is passing the buck a bit but I'd like to hear from some of the > teams that would be using this - Helix, GStreamer, Rhythmbox, Sound > Juicer, whoever. > > I know some of those groups have traditionally said "we are agnostic, > you can choose the sound server you like" but the point is to get some > judgments from people who know about multimedia. Do they think this > would be a nice improvement over esound and would they set up their > stuff to use it by default. > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=