Re: more build sherrif-ery (and a touch of auto*)
- From: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>
- To: Bryan Clark <bclark redhat com>
- Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>, Jordi Mallach <jordi sindominio net>, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>, GNOME Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, louie novell com
- Subject: Re: more build sherrif-ery (and a touch of auto*)
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:14:37 +0100
Hi,
> We've got Daniel Reed [1], extreme auto-foo samurai, who would be able
> to bring up most modules to the latest auto-tools versions pretty
> quickly. He would like to port the modules to 1.9 (current) if people
> don't have any disagreements with that. It seems reasonable to me to go
> for the latest current release if we're going to be putting time into
> this at all, but what the hell do I know about auto-tools. :-)
>
> So if there are not complaints about the version bump I'd suggest the
> maintainers duck and cover for a flurry of incoming patches.
I don't see a good reason to go for the latest. Traditionally every new
automake adds some new features and breaks some older, but if you stick
to a sane subset of them you can easily come up with something that
works for, say, 1.6-1.9
Remember that there are still people doing development on more-than-
half-year-old distros !
If this is too much for any willing auto-foo samurai, I am willing to
chip in my aid as an auto-foo gajin.
Thomas
Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
Baby no matter what love's got to offer
I burn myself down to the ground
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]