Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology
- From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>, jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:42:58 -0500
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 14:55 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> So I think we should go farther than "GNOME does not support using the
> extended .NET APIs" and say "we will oppose implementing those APIs on
> Linux at all" - unless Microsoft releases the patents, it's impossible
> for those APIs to contribute to the success of Linux, all they can do is
> encourage people to get locked in to Microsoft from a legal point of
> view. And Microsoft has said they will _not_ release these APIs.
Well, GNOME wouldn't be implementing them. That doesn't mean other
groups (Ximian/Novell) won't. GNOME using C doesn't mean that people
aren't writing illegal C libraries, either. All GNOME has say over is
which libraries and utilities go into official GNOME.
If GNOME as a group says, "We won't use Mono/CLR because it's capable of
hosting patented .NET libraries" then we ought to stop using C as well,
because I know of some legally encumbered C libraries. Oh, we ought to
stop using any shell scripts, too, someone might be illegally using SCO
shell snippets or something. Waaay too risky to be using those
languages... right? ;-)
>
> Havoc
>
>
--
Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]