On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 12:29 +0100, jamie wrote: > yes the proposal by Havoc for 2.8 was C and Python with GObject getting > enough type information for full introspection. I think most people > agree this is desirable and if no one objects then we should go forward > with this as a short term solution. > > For Gnome 3, the options increase to having C and Mono (with the Python > in 2.8 running on Mono). You keep referring to GNOME 3; presumably, this is version (GNOME 2.8) + 1. I don't speak for the release team here, or community consensus, but we may not be bumping the major version quite yet. I don't think we know what GNOME 3 is going to contain, or whether we'll be ready for it in a year from now. But that's just me. -- Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part