Re: Gnome 3 [Was: Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology]
- From: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- To: Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
- Cc: jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>, Markus Bertheau <twanger bluetwanger de>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gnome 3 [Was: Re: Where we stand in regard to the future platform / desktop technology]
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 14:07:42 +0100
Hey,
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 13:21, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 12:29 +0100, jamie wrote:
> > For Gnome 3, the options increase to having C and Mono (with the Python
> > in 2.8 running on Mono).
>
> You keep referring to GNOME 3; presumably, this is version (GNOME 2.8) +
> 1.
>
> I don't speak for the release team here, or community consensus, but we
> may not be bumping the major version quite yet. I don't think we know
> what GNOME 3 is going to contain, or whether we'll be ready for it in a
> year from now.
Absolutely. I think the consensus we've always had will be that GNOME 3
will be the release that we're willing to break API/ABI compatibility
and remove deprecated libraries etc.
I don't think there's ever been any question that the release after 2.8
will be 2.10 ...
Cheers,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]