Re: Lock'n'load! [Was: Integrating system tools in GNOME]
- From: "Sergey V. Udaltsov" <sergey_udaltsov pochta ru>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- Cc: elanthis awesomeplay com, amadorm usm edu ec, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Lock'n'load! [Was: Integrating system tools in GNOME]
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 20:02:48 +0400 (MSD)
> While I agree that adjusting the server config files
is a miserable
> idea I don't think we can honestly claim independence
from
True. We cannot. But at least we are trying to push in
this direction - and not to introduce dependencies
unless we really have no other way. "As server agnostic
as possible".
> xfree/xorg. The availability XKB, and their spotty
implementation
> quality keeps us effectively tied to xfree/xorg.
They're the only
> servers that appear to have even a remotely
functional XKB.
Well, it seems Solaris is going in that direction. At
least they claimed they had fixed the bug with unset
XKB_RULES_NAMES. If they add support for multiple
layout - they would be just "GNOME's best friends":)
Sergey
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]