Re: Proto initial GNOME 2.6 new modules decision

[Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:52:19AM +0100, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > >>  libxklavier
> > >>    (Already in, as a gnome-control-center dependency, with strong 
> > >>    community support.)
> > >>    
> > >>
> > Actually, I guessed libxklavier was not going to be a part of 
> > GNOME. I 
> > always thought of it as external dependency. So the release 
> > process for 
> > libxklavier would not be bound to the GNOME release schedule. Was I 
> > wrong? Or did I get your statement wrong?
> 
> It's not an optional dependency, so I think we all expect it to follow the
> GNOME release schedule, and that's why it was listed as a proposed new GNOME
> 2.6 module. Please tell us very clearly if you do not expect libxklavier to
> follow the GNOME Desktop release schedule. 

Hmm, I don't think we need to require that nor should we expect it.
libxklavier is alot close to the platform level (X libc) than to
GNOME.