Re: Proposed: gnome-system-tools

[Carlos Garnacho <garnacho tuxerver net>]

El vie, 09-01-2004 a las 01:43, Carlos Garnacho escribió:
> El lun, 05-01-2004 a las 03:05, Carlos Garnacho escribió:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > Even when I'd want all the tools to become part of gnome 2.6, I think I
> > already agreed to split the toolset if it's necessary, so the correct
> > consensus should be on which tools to accept. Of course the development
> > on the "rejected" tools won't stop
> 
> what's hapenning with this issue? do I have to brive everyone for even

s/hapenning/happening/, s/brive/bribe/

/me should go to sleep...

> discussing the tools that are worth of being included? :)
> 
> <proposal>
> I propose ALL the tools
> </proposal>
> 
> Any opinions? or can I go home?
> 
> 	Regards
> 
> > 
> > In one of these messages you also raise the issue of accessing HAL
> > through the backends, all I can say is that in the short term this will
> > be hard to happen, as the backends are perl scripts, but in a longer
> > term it will be more feasible
> > 
> > Sorry for not having answered these questions before :)
> > 
> > 	regards
> > 
> > > 
> > > Havoc
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>