Re: Proposed: gnome-system-tools

[Carlos Garnacho <garnacho tuxerver net>]

El lun, 05-01-2004 a las 03:05, Carlos Garnacho escribió:

<snip>

> Even when I'd want all the tools to become part of gnome 2.6, I think I
> already agreed to split the toolset if it's necessary, so the correct
> consensus should be on which tools to accept. Of course the development
> on the "rejected" tools won't stop

what's hapenning with this issue? do I have to brive everyone for even
discussing the tools that are worth of being included? :)

<proposal>
I propose ALL the tools
</proposal>

Any opinions? or can I go home?

	Regards

> 
> In one of these messages you also raise the issue of accessing HAL
> through the backends, all I can say is that in the short term this will
> be hard to happen, as the backends are perl scripts, but in a longer
> term it will be more feasible
> 
> Sorry for not having answered these questions before :)
> 
> 	regards
> 
> > 
> > Havoc
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>