Re: Proposed: gnome-network



On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 06:02, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:46, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I've submitted a bug with a lot of FreeBSD patches, but it looks like
> > > > the gnome-network guys will be converting over to libgnetwork, so my
> > > > patches might need a bit of touch up.  Overall [FreeBSD] portability is
> > > > very doable, and I'm very excited about this module.
> > > > 
> > > right, the intention is to use libgnetwork, so I guess your patches
> > > could probably better sent to libgnetwork.
> > 
> > I've already sent the patches to libgnetwork.  As soon as gnome-network
> > switches over to that, most of what I've done should be moot.  However,
> > some of the other command-based stuff (i.e. traceroute, ping, some of
> > the pipe stuff, etc.) is probably still valid within gnome-network
> > itself.
> > 
> do you mean those commands have different outputs on FreeBSD than on
> Linux?

Some do, yes.  Have a look at my patch in
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128719.

Joe

> 
> cheers
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]