On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 06:02, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:46, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > > > I've submitted a bug with a lot of FreeBSD patches, but it looks like > > > > the gnome-network guys will be converting over to libgnetwork, so my > > > > patches might need a bit of touch up. Overall [FreeBSD] portability is > > > > very doable, and I'm very excited about this module. > > > > > > > right, the intention is to use libgnetwork, so I guess your patches > > > could probably better sent to libgnetwork. > > > > I've already sent the patches to libgnetwork. As soon as gnome-network > > switches over to that, most of what I've done should be moot. However, > > some of the other command-based stuff (i.e. traceroute, ping, some of > > the pipe stuff, etc.) is probably still valid within gnome-network > > itself. > > > do you mean those commands have different outputs on FreeBSD than on > Linux? Some do, yes. Have a look at my patch in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128719. Joe > > cheers -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part