On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 17:10, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 08:02, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 01:49, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > gnome-network > > > ------------- > > > > > > Lots of cool stuff in here, but is it ready to go? Perhaps Desktop Sharing, > > > Remote Desktop Client and Network Information will be, though some UI Review > > > action would certainly help them out. The Personal Web Server and Remote > > > Shell Client might need further discussion as to what we want to get out of > > > them. I think this is totally hot stuff, all in all, but some parts might > > > need a bit more time before hitting the Desktop release. Any portability > > > concerns? > > > > I've submitted a bug with a lot of FreeBSD patches, but it looks like > > the gnome-network guys will be converting over to libgnetwork, so my > > patches might need a bit of touch up. Overall [FreeBSD] portability is > > very doable, and I'm very excited about this module. > > > right, the intention is to use libgnetwork, so I guess your patches > could probably better sent to libgnetwork. I've already sent the patches to libgnetwork. As soon as gnome-network switches over to that, most of what I've done should be moot. However, some of the other command-based stuff (i.e. traceroute, ping, some of the pipe stuff, etc.) is probably still valid within gnome-network itself. > > > > > > > Interesting dependencies: cherokee, libvncserver and libzvt (which is only > > > used by gnome-ppp, which is not built by default, and there's a continuing > > > discussion as to whether this functionality belongs here or in g-s-t). > > > > > > > > > Further discussion goes HERE! :-) > > > > It seems to me it may still need (or is scheduled to receive) a severe > > internal make-over, and may not be ready in time for 2.6. This is just > > my feeling based on feedback to my portability bug. > > > hmm, what internal make-over are you talking about? The intention is to > have gnome-network (or part of) for GNOME 2.6, so, yes, it should be > ready. I was referring to the libgnetwork change. Joe > > cheers -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part