Re: G2.10 Module Proposal: Sound Juicer

[Steven Garrity <stevelist silverorange com>]

Ryan McDougall wrote:
> It seems like s-j is preferred because its been around longer, and the
> author is better known. Is that all? 

I haven't tried the latest Sound Juicer in CVS - but it seems that 
Goobox is already a complete player/ripper - while Sound Juicer is a 
ripping with plans to become a player (is that fair?).

Ross Burton wrote:
> Note: I've not tried Goobox since a very early version, but SJ supports
> audio profiles and configurable output formats, whereas goobox doesn't.

I don't really know anything about audio profiles, but Goobox does allow 
extraction to Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, MP3, and Wave.

Steven Garrity