Re: Proposal: gnome-user-share

On Mer, 2004-12-01 at 03:52, Bryan Clark wrote:
> > How very true. Just because Apache has had a lot of security holes, and
> > they've been fixed, doesn't mean there won't be more, either.
> Arguing with me about epittance being just as secure as apache is
> ridiculous and not this list is for.

Since you can write a backend for it to use apache instead I fail to see
why there is an argument at all. Surely this is best solved with a patch

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]